Subject :Corrective Action(s) | Ref : QD24 | ||||
1.0 | Purpose | ||||
This document defines the process when the errant staff mishandles a shipment or initiates a discrepancy which is deemed a service failure. | |||||
2.0 | Scope | ||||
Applicable to any mishandling of shipment. | |||||
3.0 | Attachment | ||||
Attachment MA/QD24/001 -
Guidelines for Preparation or IRP Report Reference MA/QD19/001 - Irregularity Report (IRP) |
|||||
4.0 | Procedure | ||||
System Flow | Responsibilities & Authorities |
Related Docs & Forms |
Notes | ||
4.1 | Reporting/Errant staff
informs of the mishandling/discrepancy . |
Staff Concerned |
--- |
1 | |
4.2 | Fill-up Irregularity (IRP)
Report . |
CStaff Concerned/ Section Head |
IRP Report |
2 | |
4.3 | Look into
mishandling/discrepancy & recommend corrective action . |
Section Head | IRP Report |
3 | |
4.4 | Implement corrective active . |
Dept Head/Section Head |
--- |
4 | |
4.5 | Review/Assess corrective
action(s) implemented . |
Dept Head/QM |
--- |
5 |
¡@
Highlights/Explanation | |
Note 1: |
The staff concerned or section head on being aware
or informed of the discrepancy, will proceed on his/her part to raise the
Irregularity Report (IRP) (Reference MA/QD19/001) The IRP Report shall be
prepared/issued based on the guidelines set (Attachment
MA/QD24/001) |
Note 2: |
Necessary Details of the discrepancy shall be
recorded by the staff/section head in part 1 of the IRP Report, also
giving the causes which lead to the discrepancy and the monetary loss (if
any) which would affect the company's service level. |
Note 3: |
The section head together with the staff concerned shall look into the discrepancy and propose/recommend the corrective actions with the implementation period (if applicable) to the department head concerned which would improve the situation or rectify the problem. This will be indicated in the "Corrective Action" column on part 1 or the IRP Report. The corrective action(s) depending on the type of discrepancy, can be recommended on the following:
|
Note 4: |
The department head shall review the corrective action(s) at the end of the implementation period to assess its effectiveness and indicate his/her comments, recommendation, alternative changes/controls, etc., in Part 3 of the IRP Report. Any implementation of changes to the related discrepancy or activity shall be highlighted to the department head of the affected department and other departments (if required) by issuing an inter-office memorandum. A copy of the IRP Report and inter-office memo shall
be extended to the QM for his awareness and follow-up review. |
Note 5 |
Depending on the type of implementation, the QM shall conduct a review and assessment to check if the revised/improved activity is feasible and in order. He shall complete the IRP Report by indicating his comments and signing off. The completed copy of the IRP Report shall be kept
and filed by the QM for future reference. |
General Remarks/Comments | |
|